Husqvarna group is the world’s leading producer of Forest and Garden products, serving both residential owners and professional users in over 100 countries.
I had the opportunity to conduct my master thesis in collaboration with them. Today, Husqvarna offers a fleet management system called Husqvarna fleet services, designed for professional users of their products. The interface and features of the service are more focused on larger companies and not fully optimized for tree professionals. With a growing demand for a more tailored solution, the study aimed to identify the specific needs of arborists and loggers, as well as designing a mobile user interface for the target group.
The study began with a design review to understand how the current service worked and was perceived as a first time user. A literature review followed to gain knowledge about relevant topics, and concluded literature on the user group and the profession of tree professionals, as well as research about related works and studies to raise awareness of the current situation. The design review and literature review further made it possible to construct an interview guide. Nine interviews were conducted with arborists and loggers, both physical and digital depending on the travel distance to the participants. None of the participants used Husqvarna fleet services, even though some had tried it but did not find it valuable. Some of the participants were also observed performing their work tasks to gain further understanding of the professions. The participants communicated needs and wishes that would make them use the service. Further, problems that can occur during their workday were addressed. During the study, a new version of Husqvarna Fleet Services was released, with an updated graphical user interface, therefore a second round design review was conducted. The application continued to be more tailored to serve larger companies with a large product fleet. However, the new update provided some design elements, which served as inspiration for the ideation and prototyping.
The interviews were transcribed and together with the observations gave insights about the arborist and logger professions. These insights were written on notes and organized into clusters in a KJ-analysis. Firstly, some larger main domains emerged containing many notes, together with some smaller clusters with miscellaneous topics. These clusters were then divided into more specific sub-themes. Important themes based on the largest clusters were marked as well as the most important themes based on what was stated as especially important by the users. The marked themes were then translated into Needs statements which formulated what the user would need within a specific area to be able to solve their problems, needs or wishes. Based on the KJ-analysis and Needs statements a User requirement specification was created. This was one of the requested deliverables by Husqvarna Group and was a helpful tool to have together with the needs statements in the following ideation phase. The user requirement specification were divided into requirement groups based on the needs statements, and further divided into common, arborist specific and logger specific requirements. 54 requirements were created, and were all ranked with the MoSCoW-method, to clarify what to focus on during the develop phase.
Based on the findings from the prior data collection and the user requirement specificaction, the ideation methods Brainwriting and Crazy 8's were used to generate potential solutions and concepts fulfilling these needs and requirements. For the first method Brainwriting, ideation was conducted for each requirement group. The ideas were then discussed, and the most promising ideas were kept, while some ideas and requirements groups where decided to not proceed with because they were not feasible or did not fit in the area in which Husqvarna works. The second ideation method Crazy 8's were then based on the kept ideas, and the best ideas generated during this session were marked. The ideas were then translated into wireframes, serving as the foundation for the prototyping. The first prototype was created using both elements from Husqvarnas's design system, and self-made components. During a design critique session the prototype was reviewed by two experienced UX designers from Husqvarna Group. They provided valuable insights before the next iteration of the prototype. One of the most important takeaway from the session was that having multiple similar list views could be confusing for the user. The insights gained from the design critique session about thinking through each page once more, what the intention is and what value it brings the user, resulted in creating an Information Architecture map (IA map). The method provided a valuable overview of the prototype, in which some pages and widgets were found to be excessive. The IA map functioned as a framework for the changes in the second iteration of the prototype. The second iteration was about thinking through the prototype, ensuring that the features in the prototype fulfill the user needs as intended.
Conducting end-user tests began with inviting the interviewees who participated in the interviews to also participate in an end-user test. Each test were in the form of a cooperative evaluation, and was structured around a series of tasks, which were to be executed by using the interactive prototype on a mobile phone. After all tasks, the participants were asked to answer a SUS (System Usability Scale)-questionnaire. SUS score was 90,625 out of 100, indicating that the usability of the system is clearly above an average system, and suggests that the usability of the designed user interface is good. The user requirement specification was ranked with the MoSCoW method, where the most important themes were ranked as must-haves. To confirm if the must haves were still the most important, the participants were asked about the features that were created to fulfill these requirements, as well as features based on lower rankings. Lastly, the participants were asked a set of general questions, focusing on extracting the general thoughts and impressions of the prototype from each participant. The same type of cooperative evaluation was also conducted with product specialists at Husqvarna Group. Employees specialized in handheld products, having relevant knowledge of the features and use of Husqvarna Fleet Services. This test was done to get further feedback, and insights regarding more technical areas. These tests resulted in both confirmations and further suggestions for the service. The third iteration of the prototype based on the feedback from the user testing entitled a series of changes, mostly minor ones such as clarifying certain features.
The final design featured a user interface with four main tabs in the navigation bar; Dashboard, Products, Position and Profile.
The different pages described is referred by a number connected to the image further down in the section.
The dashboard1 is intended to include the most important information that the user wants to access quickly, such as the battery level and products in need of urgent service. On the dashboard equipment lists are available, allowing the user to check off that all equipment within a specific list is packed, prepared and charged before the work day. The user is able to turn on reminders which will send out notifications if the user leaves without any of the products, preventing the users from forgetting or losing their equipment. The edit pen in the top right corner, allows the user to personalize the dashboard to their role or profession. The user can rearrange the order of the widgets, remove, edit and even add others that might be more relevant to them.
The second navigation item features all products in the fleet2. From this page, the user has the possibility to filter and sort the products from a bunch of orders. In the bottom, a primary button gives the user the possibility to add new products in their product fleet. When a product is selected in the list the user arrives on the product details page3. From this page the user can access all functions related to that specific product.
In the service & maintenance page6 reachable from the product details page the user is introduced to three maintenance countdowns based on runtime. Following this, is a button leading into the spare parts page. The errors widget informs the user about current errors with the product, as well as the proposed fix. Underneath, the service logs are gathered, where new service events can be added. The spare parts page7 features a scrollable list of spare part cards. The page is divided into several tabs containing groups of spare parts, aligning with the manuals. When an exploded view is available it is placed as a zoomable background helping the user in finding the right part.
When entering a battery details page there is an add label button4,5. This feature was added to meet the need of separating batteries from each other. The concept is based on Husqvarna Group including a set of battery labels in six colors in the package of a battery, providing the user with a convenient and coherent way to distinguish their batteries. To fully make the experience seamless between the application and the physical product there is a function to add a label in the application. This would allow the user to replicate the physical label, making it easier to manage the batteries within the application.
The position tab8 includes all information about the real-time GPS position of the products within the fleet, fulfilling. The user is introduced with a panable and zoomable map showing the location of each product, and if several products are located at the same place they are grouped together, with an indication in the top right of total products at that location. In the list the user can scroll trough all products, and for efficiency reasons there is a possibility to search for specific products. When selecting a product on the map, the user gets zoomed in to the location of that specific product on the map9. The list is then changed to product position information, including address, coordinates, and directions.
The profile page10 contains user details, including name, role, and picture. Following this, is a team widget, showcasing the team member and their roles. Underneath is a widget containing the account settings page, legal page, news page, and the feedback page. Within the account settings, the user can manage notification options related to postilion, battery, service and for breaks.
The prototype fulfilled 30 of the 54 user requirements including the ones found to be most important. As mentioned in the process the prototype scored high on the SUS-questionnaire indicating good usability. Further all participants thought that they would use the app regularly and that it would make their job days easier. The participants said that they felt the app was well suited for their professions. Even though this is a confirmation of a good prototype, an encouragement to do even more testing was passed to the company to get a bigger sample of data.
One of the key learnings was how valuable it is to get feedback from different perspectives. What might be considered “good” by a user might raise concerns from a UX designer regarding accessibility, consistency, or long-term usability. Balancing input from users, designers, developers, and stakeholders was sometimes challenging, especially when opinions conflicted. However, I learned to navigate this by identifying the underlying needs behind each perspective and using that to inform better design and product decisions.
One of the challenges was working on a project while similar initiatives were being developed by other teams at Husqvarna group. Although this created a risk of overlap and conflicting directions, we had a different approach where we focused deeply on user needs rather than starting from existing solutions or technical constraints. We were encouraged to challenge what is considered feasible today in order to truly explore and define what matters most to the users. This mindset helped us avoid settling for incremental improvements and instead aim for more impactful outcomes.
Overall I am very pleased with the process and result of the project, now knowing it has contributed with valuable insights for Husqvarna Group that they will continue working with.